linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	robert.moore@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: Introduce persistent storage for cpuid <-> apicid mapping
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:00:41 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610071455360.19804@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610071448590.19804@nanos>

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > Is it possible that the "-1/oxffffffff" could appear in the MADT which is one
> > of the ACPI tables?
> 
> According to the SDM the x2apic id is a 32bit ID, so 0xffffffff is a
> legitimate value.

The ACPI spec says that bit 0 of the x2apic flags field tells whether the
logical processor is present or not. So the proper check for x2apic is that
flag.

The lapic structure has the same flag, but the kernel ignores the flags for
both lapic and x2apic.

I'm going to apply the minimal fix of checking for id == 0xff in
acpi_lapic_parse() for now, but this needs to be revisited and fixed
proper.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-07 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-25  8:35 [PATCH v12 0/7] Make cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent Dou Liyang
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 1/7] x86, memhp, numa: Online memory-less nodes at boot time Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:09   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/numa: " tip-bot for Tang Chen
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 2/7] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Enable acpi to register all possible cpus " Dou Liyang
2016-08-25  8:57   ` Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:10   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: " tip-bot for Gu Zheng
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 3/7] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Introduce cpuid_to_apicid[] array to store persistent cpuid <-> apicid mapping Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:10   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: Introduce persistent storage for " tip-bot for Gu Zheng
2016-10-04  6:02     ` Yinghai Lu
2016-10-05 14:04       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-06  4:53         ` Yinghai Lu
2016-10-06  8:06           ` Dou Liyang
2016-10-06 21:20             ` Yinghai Lu
2016-10-07  4:35               ` Dou Liyang
2016-10-07 12:50                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-07 13:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-07 18:55                     ` Yinghai Lu
2016-10-08  5:22                     ` Dou Liyang
2016-10-07 11:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-07 11:04               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-07 13:07             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-08  4:14               ` Dou Liyang
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 4/7] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Enable MADT APIs to return disabled apicid Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:11   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: Enable MADT APIs to return disabled apicids tip-bot for Gu Zheng
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 5/7] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Set persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping when booting Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:11   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/acpi: " tip-bot for Gu Zheng
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 6/7] acpi: Provide the mechanism to validate processors in the ACPI tables Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:12   ` [tip:x86/apic] acpi: Provide " tip-bot for Dou Liyang
2016-08-25  8:35 ` [PATCH v12 7/7] acpi: Provide the interface to validate the proc_id Dou Liyang
2016-09-22 19:12   ` [tip:x86/apic] acpi: Validate processor id when mapping the processor tip-bot for Dou Liyang
2016-08-25  9:08 ` [PATCH v12 0/7] Make cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent Dou Liyang
2016-09-02  6:57 ` Dou Liyang
2016-09-13 11:33   ` Dou Liyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610071455360.19804@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).