From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756967AbcJTVza (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:55:30 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49822 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752900AbcJTVz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:55:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 23:52:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Irina Tirdea cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Ingo Molnar , Michael Turquette , "H. Peter Anvin" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , Takashi Iwai , Pierre-Louis Bossart , LKML , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks In-Reply-To: <1476735320-4315-1-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1476735320-4315-1-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Irina Tirdea wrote: > The patch has already been reviewed by Stephen Boyd [1]. > The only remaining question is the one pointed out by Stephen: > "Will there be problems if this merges through clk tree? If so we > could take the clk driver part and the platform data include part > could be duplicated into both trees. Or clk tree could be pulled > into x86?" [1] The proper thing to do is: Move all that cruft including arch/x86/platform/atom/pmc_atom.c into drivers/platform/x86. There is nothing architecture specific in these files. It's pure peripheral driver enablement. So drivers/platform/x86 is the proper location for this. Please discuss this with Darren Hart (cc'ed). Thanks, tglx