From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752456AbcKRHdE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:33:04 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:50916 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752291AbcKRHc7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:32:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:28:08 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Kyle Huey , "Robert O'Callahan" , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Radim_Kr=E8m=E1=F8?= , Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , Alexander Viro , Shuah Khan , Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dmitry Safonov , David Matlack , Nadav Amit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Rename do_arch_prctl to do_arch_prctl_64 In-Reply-To: <20161118072723.GA15912@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20161117020610.5302-1-khuey@kylehuey.com> <20161117020610.5302-3-khuey@kylehuey.com> <20161118072723.GA15912@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Kyle Huey wrote: > > > In order to introduce new arch_prctls that are not 64 bit only, rename the > > existing 64 bit implementation to do_arch_prctl_64(). Also rename the second > > argument to arch_prctl(), which will no longer always be an address. > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > void entry_SYSCALL_64(void); > > +long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2); > > #endif > > Could you please also rename the weirdly named 'code' argument to 'option', > to be in line with the existing sys_prctl() interface nomenclature? I'll fix that up when picking up the series. No need for another iteration, ok? Thanks, tglx