linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] x86/mm: check in_compat_syscall() instead TIF_ADDR32 for mmap(MAP_32BIT)
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:13:01 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702112107490.3734@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170130120432.6716-5-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote:

> At this momet, logic in arch_get_unmapped_area{,_topdown} for mmaps with
> MAP_32BIT flag checks TIF_ADDR32 which means:
> o if 32-bit ELF changes mode to 64-bit on x86_64 and then tries to
>   mmap() with MAP_32BIT it'll result in addr over 4Gb (as default is
>   top-down allocation)
> o if 64-bit ELF changes mode to 32-bit and tries mmap() with MAP_32BIT,
>   it'll allocate only memory in 1GB space: [0x40000000, 0x80000000).
> 
> Fix it by handeling MAP_32BIT in 64-bit syscalls only.

I really have a hard time to understand what is fixed and how that is
related to the $subject.

Again. Please explain the problem first properly so one can understand the
issue immediately.

> As a little bonus it'll make thread flag a little less used.

I really do not understand the bonus part here. You replace the thread flag
check with a different one and AFAICT this looks like oart of the 'fix'.

Thanks,

	tglx

> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, len,
>  static void find_start_end(unsigned long flags, unsigned long *begin,
>  			   unsigned long *end)
>  {
> -	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)) {
> +	if (!in_compat_syscall() && (flags & MAP_32BIT)) {
>  		/* This is usually used needed to map code in small
>  		   model, so it needs to be in the first 31bit. Limit
>  		   it to that.  This means we need to move the
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
>  		return addr;
>  
>  	/* for MAP_32BIT mappings we force the legacy mmap base */
> -	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT))
> +	if (!in_compat_syscall() && (flags & MAP_32BIT))
>  		goto bottomup;
>  
>  	/* requesting a specific address */
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-11 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 12:04 [PATCHv4 0/5] Fix compatible mmap() return pointer over 4Gb Dmitry Safonov
2017-01-30 12:04 ` [PATCHv4 1/5] x86/mm: split arch_mmap_rnd() on compat/native versions Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-09 13:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-09 23:06     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-10 20:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-10 20:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-10 21:28       ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-11  8:23         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13 11:12           ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-13 11:22             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-30 12:04 ` [PATCHv4 2/5] x86/mm: introduce mmap{,_legacy}_base Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-11 14:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13 13:02     ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-13 13:13       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13 14:37     ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-13 15:35       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-30 12:04 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] x86/mm: fix 32-bit mmap() for 64-bit ELF Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-11 19:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-14 15:24     ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-01-30 12:04 ` [PATCHv4 4/5] x86/mm: check in_compat_syscall() instead TIF_ADDR32 for mmap(MAP_32BIT) Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-11 20:13   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-02-14 16:11     ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 16:14       ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-01-30 12:04 ` [PATCHv4 5/5] selftests/x86: add test to check compat mmap() return addr Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-06 16:46 ` [PATCHv4 0/5] Fix compatible mmap() return pointer over 4Gb Dmitry Safonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1702112107490.3734@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).