linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] mm, page_alloc: fix more premature OOM due to race with cpuset update
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:24:25 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704111152170.25069@east.gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411140609.3787-2-vbabka@suse.cz>

On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> The root of the problem is that the cpuset's mems_allowed and mempolicy's
> nodemask can temporarily have no intersection, thus get_page_from_freelist()
> cannot find any usable zone. The current semantic for empty intersection is to
> ignore mempolicy's nodemask and honour cpuset restrictions. This is checked in
> node_zonelist(), but the racy update can happen after we already passed the

The fallback was only intended for a cpuset on which boundaries are not enforced
in critical conditions (softwall). A hardwall cpuset (CS_MEM_HARDWALL)
should fail the allocation.

> This patch fixes the issue by having __alloc_pages_slowpath() check for empty
> intersection of cpuset and ac->nodemask before OOM or allocation failure. If
> it's indeed empty, the nodemask is ignored and allocation retried, which mimics
> node_zonelist(). This works fine, because almost all callers of

Well that would need to be subject to the hardwall flag. Allocation needs
to fail for a hardwall cpuset.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11 14:06 [RFC 0/6] cpuset/mempolicies related fixes and cleanups Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 1/6] mm, page_alloc: fix more premature OOM due to race with cpuset update Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 17:24   ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2017-04-11 19:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-12 21:25       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-13  6:24         ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-14 20:37           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-26  8:07             ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-30 21:33               ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-17  9:20                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 13:56                   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-17 14:05                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 14:48                       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-17 14:56                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 15:25                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-18  9:08                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 16:57                               ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-18 17:24                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-18 19:07                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-19  7:37                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-17 15:27                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-18 10:03                         ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-05-18 17:07                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-19 11:27                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-13  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-04-13  6:06     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-13  6:07       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 2/6] mm, mempolicy: stop adjusting current->il_next in mpol_rebind_nodemask() Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 17:32   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 19:03     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-12  8:49       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-12 21:16         ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-12 21:18           ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 3/6] mm, page_alloc: pass preferred nid instead of zonelist to allocator Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 4/6] mm, mempolicy: simplify rebinding mempolicies when updating cpusets Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 5/6] mm, cpuset: always use seqlock when changing task's nodemask Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-12  8:10   ` Hillf Danton
2017-04-12  8:18     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-11 14:06 ` [RFC 6/6] mm, mempolicy: don't check cpuset seqlock where it doesn't matter Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1704111152170.25069@east.gentwo.org \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).