[PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Chandra Annamaneni]

Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl

Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
index e074841..59e861e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_open(struct file *filp)
  	struct most_video_dev *mdev = video_drvdata(filp);
  	struct aim_fh *fh;

-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_open()\n");
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

  	switch (vdev->vfl_type) {
  	case VFL_TYPE_GRABBER:
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_close(struct file *filp)
  	struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
  	struct mbo *mbo, *tmp;

-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_close()\n");
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

  	/*
  	 * We need to put MBOs back before we call most_stop_channel()
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int vidioc_g_std(struct file *file, void *priv, v4l2_std_id *norm)
  	struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
  	struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;

-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_g_std()\n");
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

  	*norm = V4L2_STD_UNKNOWN;
  	return 0;
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int vidioc_s_input(struct file *file, void *priv, unsigned int index)
  	struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
  	struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;

-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_s_input(%d)\n", index);
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s(%d)\n", __func__, index);

  	if (index >= V4L2_AIM_MAX_INPUT)
  		return -EINVAL;
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct most_video_dev *mdev)
  {
  	int ret;

-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_register_videodev()\n");
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

  	init_waitqueue_head(&mdev->wait_data);

@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct most_video_dev *mdev)

  static void aim_unregister_videodev(struct most_video_dev *mdev)
  {
-	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_unregister_videodev()\n");
+	v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

  	video_unregister_device(mdev->vdev);
  }

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Christian Gromm]

Sorry for the delay...


On 04/10/2017 05:24 AM, chandrasekhar annamaneni wrote:
>
> Second reminder, please review.
>
> Thanks.
> Chandra
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Chandra Annamaneni
> <chandra627@gmail.com <mailto:chandra627@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
>     Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl <http://checkpatch.pl>
>
>     Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com
>     <mailto:chandra627@gmail.com>>

Acked-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@microchip.com>

>
>     diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>     b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>     index e074841..59e861e 100644
>     --- a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>     +++ b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>     @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_open(struct file *filp)
>             struct most_video_dev *mdev = video_drvdata(filp);
>             struct aim_fh *fh;
>
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_open()\n");
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
>             switch (vdev->vfl_type) {
>             case VFL_TYPE_GRABBER:
>     @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_close(struct file *filp)
>             struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
>             struct mbo *mbo, *tmp;
>
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_close()\n");
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
>             /*
>              * We need to put MBOs back before we call most_stop_channel()
>     @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int vidioc_g_std(struct file *file, void
>     *priv, v4l2_std_id *norm)
>             struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
>             struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
>
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_g_std()\n");
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
>             *norm = V4L2_STD_UNKNOWN;
>             return 0;
>     @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int vidioc_s_input(struct file *file,
>     void *priv, unsigned int index)
>             struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
>             struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
>
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_s_input(%d)\n", index);
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s(%d)\n", __func__, index);
>
>             if (index >= V4L2_AIM_MAX_INPUT)
>                     return -EINVAL;
>     @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct
>     most_video_dev *mdev)
>      {
>             int ret;
>
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_register_videodev()\n");
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
>             init_waitqueue_head(&mdev->wait_data);
>
>     @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct
>     most_video_dev *mdev)
>
>      static void aim_unregister_videodev(struct most_video_dev *mdev)
>      {
>     -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_unregister_videodev()\n");
>     +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
>             video_unregister_device(mdev->vdev);
>      }
>
>

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Chandra Annamaneni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3244 bytes --]


Third Reminder. Please review.

--
Chandra


On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, chandrasekhar annamaneni wrote:

> 
> Second reminder, please review.
> 
> Thanks.
> Chandra
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>       Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
>       Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
> 
>       Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>
> 
>       diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>       b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>       index e074841..59e861e 100644
>       --- a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>       +++ b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
>       @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_open(struct file *filp)
>               struct most_video_dev *mdev = video_drvdata(filp);
>               struct aim_fh *fh;
> 
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_open()\n");
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> 
>               switch (vdev->vfl_type) {
>               case VFL_TYPE_GRABBER:
>       @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_close(struct file *filp)
>               struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
>               struct mbo *mbo, *tmp;
> 
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_close()\n");
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> 
>               /*
>                * We need to put MBOs back before we call
>       most_stop_channel()
>       @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int vidioc_g_std(struct file *file,
>       void *priv, v4l2_std_id *norm)
>               struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
>               struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
> 
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_g_std()\n");
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> 
>               *norm = V4L2_STD_UNKNOWN;
>               return 0;
>       @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int vidioc_s_input(struct file *file,
>       void *priv, unsigned int index)
>               struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
>               struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
> 
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_s_input(%d)\n",
>       index);
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s(%d)\n", __func__, index);
> 
>               if (index >= V4L2_AIM_MAX_INPUT)
>                       return -EINVAL;
>       @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct
>       most_video_dev *mdev)
>        {
>               int ret;
> 
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_register_videodev()\n");
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> 
>               init_waitqueue_head(&mdev->wait_data);
> 
>       @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct
>       most_video_dev *mdev)
> 
>        static void aim_unregister_videodev(struct most_video_dev
>       *mdev)
>        {
>       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev,
>       "aim_unregister_videodev()\n");
>       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> 
>               video_unregister_device(mdev->vdev);
>        }
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Greg KH]

Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?


http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:40:25AM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> 
> Third Reminder. Please review.

2 days after you asked before?

And I don't even see this patch in my queue, are you sure it hasn't
already been handled, or merged, or rejected?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 00:40 -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> Third Reminder. Please review.

Patience.

> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, chandrasekhar annamaneni wrote:
> > Second reminder, please review.
[]
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >       Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
> >       Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
[]
> >       diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
[]
> >       @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_open(struct file *filp)
> >               struct most_video_dev *mdev = video_drvdata(filp);
> >               struct aim_fh *fh;
> > 
> >       -       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_open()\n");
> >       +       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);

More likely all of these should be deleted
as these seem to be function tracing logging
and ftrace works well.

see: Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Chandra Annamaneni]

Sorry about the top posting.

I did ask about it on the 9th of April and the reply was that the email
was 'acked'. Since I did not get a further email, I assumed it was lost.
Perhaps I misunderstood.

Thanks!
Chandra


On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Greg KH wrote:

> 
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> 
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> 
> 
> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> 
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:40:25AM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> > 
> > Third Reminder. Please review.
> 
> 2 days after you asked before?
> 
> And I don't even see this patch in my queue, are you sure it hasn't
> already been handled, or merged, or rejected?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:06:54AM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> 
> Sorry about the top posting.
> 
> I did ask about it on the 9th of April and the reply was that the email
> was 'acked'. Since I did not get a further email, I assumed it was lost.
> Perhaps I misunderstood.

I really do not know, sorry.  If you didn't get an automated email from
my system that it was applied, rebased it against the latest
staging-next branch and resend it.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Chandra Annamaneni]

    Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
    Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
    
    Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c 
b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
index e074841..59e861e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/aim-v4l2/video.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_open(struct file *filp)
        struct most_video_dev *mdev = video_drvdata(filp);
        struct aim_fh *fh;
 
-       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_open()\n");
+       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
        switch (vdev->vfl_type) {
        case VFL_TYPE_GRABBER:
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int aim_vdev_close(struct file *filp)
        struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
        struct mbo *mbo, *tmp;
 
-       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_vdev_close()\n");
+       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
        /*
         * We need to put MBOs back before we call most_stop_channel()
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int vidioc_g_std(struct file *file, void *priv, 
v4l2_std_id *norm)
        struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
        struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
 
-       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_g_std()\n");
+       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
        *norm = V4L2_STD_UNKNOWN;
        return 0;
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int vidioc_s_input(struct file *file, void 
*priv, unsigned int index)
        struct aim_fh *fh = priv;
        struct most_video_dev *mdev = fh->mdev;
 
-       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "vidioc_s_input(%d)\n", index);
+       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s(%d)\n", __func__, index);
 
        if (index >= V4L2_AIM_MAX_INPUT)
                return -EINVAL;
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int aim_register_videodev(struct most_video_dev 
*mdev)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "aim_register_videodev()\n");
+       v4l2_info(&mdev->v4l2_dev, "%s()\n", __func__);


On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Greg KH wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:06:54AM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry about the top posting.
> > 
> > I did ask about it on the 9th of April and the reply was that the email
> > was 'acked'. Since I did not get a further email, I assumed it was lost.
> > Perhaps I misunderstood.
> 
> I really do not know, sorry.  If you didn't get an automated email from
> my system that it was applied, rebased it against the latest
> staging-next branch and resend it.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:20:22PM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> 
>     Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
>     Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>

Why is this indented?  Why is your subject a "Re:"?

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Chandra Annamaneni]

I assumed the email should be a reply to the previous email so it appears 
in the thread. As to the leading spaces, it was a problem with my mail 
client.

Ill resend the patch.

--
Chandra


On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Greg KH wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:20:22PM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> > 
> >     Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
> >     Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>
> 
> Why is this indented?  Why is your subject a "Re:"?
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: most: use __func__ instead of the function name

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 19:28 -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> I assumed the email should be a reply to the previous email so it appears 
> in the thread. As to the leading spaces, it was a problem with my mail 
> client.
> 
> Ill resend the patch.

Did you read my suggestion to just delete these lines instead?

> --
> Chandra
> 
> 
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:20:22PM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> > > 
> > >     Change video.c to use %s, __func__ instead of function names.
> > >     Warnings flagged by checkpatch.pl
> > >     
> > >     Signed-off-by: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Why is this indented?  Why is your subject a "Re:"?
> > 
> >