From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1757581AbdELHnu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 12 May 2017 03:43:50 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52056 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1756413AbdELHnr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 12 May 2017 03:43:47 -0400
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:43:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?
In-Reply-To: <87r2zuc08d.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705120941060.1800@nanos>
References: <87k25ol41u.fsf@xmission.com> <CA+55aFxj4Oe8+DbNLzk+SKoW99MTeF+m1SAiC4hgW=bN2dpvEQ@mail.gmail.com> <87h90rj2ub.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <1de8bc32-ebac-141a-080a-ef1c5a149904@landley.net> <87r2zuc08d.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 12 May 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>   Fixes: BKrev: 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch")
> 
> In your tree that is c3c107051660 ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch"),
> but you don't have the 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg revision recorded
> anywhere that I can see.

That's correct. I did not include the BK revisions when I imported the
commits into the history git. I did not see any reason to do so. I still
have no idea what the value would have been or why anyone wants to
reference them at all.

Thanks,

	tglx