From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752654AbdFPKX0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:23:26 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:53690 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752426AbdFPKXZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:23:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:23:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] genirq/affinity: factor out a irq_affinity_set helper In-Reply-To: <20170603140403.27379-4-hch@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20170603140403.27379-1-hch@lst.de> <20170603140403.27379-4-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 3 Jun 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > + > +bool irq_affinity_set(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) This should be named irq_affinity_force() because it circumvents the 'move in irq context' mechanism. I'll do that myself. No need to resend. Thanks, tglx