From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753137AbdFPKaL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:30:11 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:53755 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752436AbdFPKaK (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:30:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] genirq/affinity: update CPU affinity for CPU hotplug
 events
In-Reply-To: <20170603140403.27379-6-hch@lst.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706161226210.2254@nanos>
References: <20170603140403.27379-1-hch@lst.de> <20170603140403.27379-6-hch@lst.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +static void irq_affinity_online_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> +				    unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *affinity;
> +	struct irq_data *data;
> +	struct irq_chip *chip;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	cpumask_var_t mask;
> +
> +	if (!desc)
> +		return;
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		return;

That's silly. Why want you to do that for each irq descriptor? That's
outright silly. Either you allocated it in irq_affinity_[on|off]line_cpu()
once or just make it a static cpumask. Lemme fix that up.

Thanks,

	tglx