From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752556AbdJSJPr (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:15:47 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60339 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752524AbdJSJPn (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:15:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:15:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , USB list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: add SPDX identifiers to all files in drivers/usb/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20171019083832.GA21820@kroah.com> <20171019085205.GA24487@kroah.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:49:47AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> wrote: > >> > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files to make it easier to > >> > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses. This patch adds these > >> > identifiers to all files in drivers/usb/ based on a script and data from > >> > Thomas Gleixner, Philippe Ombredanne, and Kate Stewart. > >> > > >> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > >> > Cc: Kate Stewart > >> > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne > >> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> > --- > >> > Unless someone really complains, I'm going to add this to my tree for > >> > 4.15-rc1. > >> > >> It would be good to include a diffstat, esp. when touching +600 files. > > > > I wanted to, but I was worried it would be too long to prevent the patch > > from hitting the list :) > > > > Here it is: > > [...] > > Thanks! > > BTW, some files seem to be "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-1.0+". > Was this intentional, given COPYING says the default is v2? Yes. The license mentioned in the file says something like: This is licensed under GPL. which is equivalent to GPL-1.0+. Thanks, tglx