From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751932AbdK1J0G (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:26:06 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:27719 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133AbdK1J0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:26:03 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,467,1505772000"; d="scan'208";a="246318932" Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:26:00 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SF Markus Elfring cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Joe Perches , "Andrew F. Davis" , Arvind Yadav , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tomi Valkeinen , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1511809633.32426.70.camel@perches.com> <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >>>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests > >>>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. > >>> > >>> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction. > >> > >> From which places did you get this impression? > > > > Perhaps from the text that you have written only four lines below. > > All comments are dismissed as "the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance". > > A mixture will always evolve. > > * Some acceptance might not need further considerations. > > * But the disagreements are remembered differently. > They have got a potential for further improvements in some areas. > > > > If you look at the patches sent by others, who learn from > > the feedback provided to them, > > I am also learning to some degree continuously. > > > > there are not so many responses on the disagreements side. > > How do you think about to look at the details for such an observation? > > > > So the mixture is not usual. > > I find that it can be also a matter of statistics. > > > > Since you send lots of patches on the same issues, > > Yes. - I am trying to fix some implementation details by the means > of source code analysis and corresponding transformation. > The patch count is still growing. > > > > there should be no disagreements at all at this point. > > I got an other impression. The probability for disagreements is increasing > in relation to the number of contributors to which I show change possibilities. No. You should learn from the previous submissions what concerns people have and address them up front. julia > > There are also other open issues remaining which can get another > solution somehow. > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >