linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars Wendler <wendler.lars@web.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Betkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y on x86_64 causes gcc to segfault when building x86_32 binaries
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 23:22:57 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801032322160.1957@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrW8RD2vtcUjYoq07DEiLoXYxqXuxD7xujOtuF=UGjNYvw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Lars Wendler wrote:
> >> > Am Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:05:38 +0100 (CET)
> >> > schrieb Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>:
> >> > > Also can you please try Linus v4.15-rc6 with PTI enabled so we can see
> >> > > whether that's a backport issue or a general one?
> >> >
> >> > Same problem with 4.15-rc6. So I suppose that means it's a general
> >> > issue.
> >>
> >> Just a shot in the dark as I just decoded another issue on a AMD CPU. Can
> >> you please try the patch below?
> >
> > Ok. Found the real issue. This is a problem on AMD boxen.
> >
> > Fix below.
> >
> > Can Xen folks please have a look at that as well?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >         tglx
> >
> > 8<-------------------
> >
> > arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S |   13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
> > @@ -190,8 +190,13 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSCALL_compat)
> >         /* Interrupts are off on entry. */
> >         swapgs
> >
> > -       /* Stash user ESP and switch to the kernel stack. */
> > +       /* Stash user ESP */
> >         movl    %esp, %r8d
> > +
> > +       /* Use %rsp as scratch reg. User ESP is stashed in r8 */
> > +       SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 scratch_reg=%rsp
> > +
> > +       /* Switch to the kernel stack */
> >         movq    PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp
> >
> >         /* Construct struct pt_regs on stack */
> > @@ -220,12 +225,6 @@ GLOBAL(entry_SYSCALL_compat_after_hwfram
> >         pushq   $0                      /* pt_regs->r15 = 0 */
> >
> >         /*
> > -        * We just saved %rdi so it is safe to clobber.  It is not
> > -        * preserved during the C calls inside TRACE_IRQS_OFF anyway.
> > -        */
> > -       SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 scratch_reg=%rdi
> > -
> > -       /*
> >          * User mode is traced as though IRQs are on, and SYSENTER
> >          * turned them off.
> >          */
> 
> What's the issue that this is fixing?

> >         movq    PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp

before switching CR3 is obviously broken ...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180103123723.1dd26828@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec>
2018-01-03 11:57 ` CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y on x86_64 causes gcc to segfault when building x86_32 binaries Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 12:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 13:30     ` Lars Wendler
2018-01-03 15:21       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 15:42         ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-03 18:52         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 22:12           ` Laura Abbott
2018-01-03 22:14           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-03 22:22             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-01-03 23:43               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-03 22:27             ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-03 22:25           ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/pti: Switch to kernel CR3 at early in entry_SYSCALL_compat() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-03 23:46           ` CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y on x86_64 causes gcc to segfault when building x86_32 binaries Lars Wendler
2018-01-04  2:44           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-01-03 15:40       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-03 23:22         ` Lars Wendler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801032322160.1957@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wendler.lars@web.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).