From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932883AbeCSO4k (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:56:40 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60447 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754406AbeCSO4h (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:56:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:56:24 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christoph Hellwig cc: x86@kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Tom Lendacky , David Woodhouse , Muli Ben-Yehuda , Jon Mason , Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3 In-Reply-To: <20180319103826.12853-1-hch@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20180319103826.12853-1-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series switches the x86 code the the dma-direct implementation > for direct (non-iommu) dma and the generic swiotlb ops. This includes > getting rid of the special ops for the AMD memory encryption case and > the STA2x11 SOC. The generic implementations are based on the x86 > code, so they provide the same functionality. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner