From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753082AbeDTQvX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:51:23 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:46518 "EHLO
        mail-qk0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751865AbeDTQvV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:51:21 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo/cfnuGMql+/FVbplwUlloK3+a0IVEZPstD3l46+UaawH1gc8AjWndHJrfVMivLWxg2LuULw==
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver <vince@maine.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>, mingo@elte.hu,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/core: what is exclude_idle supposed to do
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804201015250.22578@macbook-air>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804201247050.28907@macbook-air>
References: <CABPqkBS6MuO6Twtq=_+TDV=RNy0_2vRWf=LVCk6wk0tPwNSTog@mail.gmail.com> <20180417062010.GA2052@krava> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804181109100.1587@macbook-air> <20180420083607.GG4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804201015250.22578@macbook-air>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Vince Weaver wrote:

> > AFAICT it works on Power and possibly ARM.
> 
> at least some ARMs are a bit more honest about it than x86
> 
> ivybridge:
> 	Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
> 	1,368,162      instructions
> 	1,368,162      instructions:I
> 
> pi2/ARM cortex-A7
> 	Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
> 	1,910,083      instructions
> 	<not supported>      instructions:I
> 
> I'd fire up my Power8 machine to see but not sure it's worth the hassle 
> and/or having to get out the ear protection.

I did power up the Power8 machine in the end:

power8:
	perf stat -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
	Performance counter stats for 'sleep 5':
        14,271,273      cycles
        14,271,273      cycles:I

???

But then if I try again on power8

	perf stat -a -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
	 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
	1,238,772,322,327      cycles
 	1,238,674,771,713      cycles:I   

there is a difference.

But then on ivybridge

	perf stat -a -e cycles,cycles:I sleep 5
	Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
	589,598,104      cycles
	589,537,190      cycles:I

there is also a different in system wide mode.

So maybe exclude_idle does do something on x86?  Or am I completely 
misunderstanding what the flag is supposed to be indicating?

Vince