From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60565C3279B for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 19:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22170224F9 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 19:23:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 22170224F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934747AbeGFTXy (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:23:54 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55882 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934536AbeGFTXw (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:23:52 -0400 Received: from p4fea482e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.72.46] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fbWKB-0003rt-99; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:23:23 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 21:23:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Paolo Bonzini cc: LKML , Radim Krcmar , Peter Zijlstra , Juergen Gross , Pavel Tatashin , steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] x86/kvmclock: Move kvmclock vsyscall param and init to kvmclock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20180706161307.733337643@linutronix.de> <20180706162049.765314976@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > @@ -241,6 +269,9 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void) > > return; > > } > > > > + if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_KVM)) > > + kvmclock_vsyscall = 0; > > + > > No need for this; by the time you get here, the condition will always be > true. And if you don't have kvmclock, hv_clock will be NULL and > initialization will be skipped anyway in kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo. Right, stupid me.