From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=P5JM=LW=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEE3C433F5
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat,  8 Sep 2018 12:15:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4144A2064D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat,  8 Sep 2018 12:15:16 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4144A2064D
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726949AbeIHRAt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:00:49 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:37545 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726452AbeIHRAt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:00:49 -0400
Received: from p4fea45ac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.69.172] helo=nanos)
        by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
        (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <tglx@linutronix.de>)
        id 1fyc8s-0007wd-7y; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 14:15:10 +0200
Date:   Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:15:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Convert to using %pOFn instead of
 device_node.name
In-Reply-To: <20180828015252.28511-24-robh@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809081414150.1402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180828015252.28511-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180828015252.28511-24-robh@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Rob Herring wrote:

> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Should I take it or do you want to take it with others? If the latter,
acked-by-me.

Thanks,

	tglx