On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Brijesh Singh wrote: > On 9/14/18 2:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> /* > >> + * Clear the memory encryption mask from the .bss..decrypted section. > >> + * The bss section will be memset to zero later in the initialization so > >> + * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption > >> + * attribute. > >> + */ > >> + if (mem_encrypt_active()) { > >> + vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted; > >> + vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted; > >> + for (; vaddr < vaddr_end; vaddr += PMD_SIZE) { > >> + i = pmd_index(vaddr); > >> + pmd[i] -= sme_get_me_mask(); > >> + } > >> + } > > Why isn't this chunk at the end of sme_encrypt_kernel() instead of here? > > The sme_encrypt_kernel() does not have access to pmd (after pointer > fixup is applied). You can extend the sme_encrypt_kernel() to pass an > additional arguments but then we start getting in include hell. The pmd > is defined as "pmdval_t". If we extend the sme_encrypt_kernel() thenĀ  > asm/mem_encrypt.h need to include the header file which defines > "pmdval_t". Adding the 'asm/pgtable_type.h' was causing all kind of > compilation errors. I didn't spend much time on it. IMO, we really don't > need to go in this path unless we see some value from doing this. Keep it here then. > >> @@ -345,6 +363,7 @@ SECTIONS > >> __bss_start = .; > >> *(.bss..page_aligned) > >> *(.bss) > >> + BSS_DECRYPTED > >> . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); > >> __bss_stop = .; > > Putting it in the BSS would need a bit of care in the future as it poses > > a certain ordering on the calls in x86_64_start_kernel() (not that there > > isn't any now :)): > > > Hmm, I thought since we are explicitly saying that attribute will add > the variables in the bss section so caller should not be using the > variable before bss is ready. If you are concerns that clear_bss() may > get called after the variable is used then we could memset(0) when while > clearing the C-bit. I did try to add some comments when we are clearing > the C-bit. I can include some verbatim in BSS_DECRYPTED section as well. Nah. It's clearly marked __bss_decrypted and anything which stores data in a BSS location is busted whether thats .bss or .bss..decrypted. If someone is not aware about the BSS constraints in general, i.e. don't use it before clear_bss(), then I really can't help it. Thanks, tglx