From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BDAC43441 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDFD21582 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:29:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1EDFD21582 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388439AbeKPCiX (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:38:23 -0500 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:52167 "EHLO relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726910AbeKPCiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:38:22 -0500 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1gNKWZ-00040r-Fd from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:29:47 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.90) by SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:29:43 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gNKWV-000796-56; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:29:43 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:29:43 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" CC: Daniel Colascione , Szabolcs Nagy , Dave P Martin , nd , Florian Weimer , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , linux-kernel , Joel Fernandes , Linux API , Willy Tarreau , Vlastimil Babka , Carlos O'Donell , "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Official Linux system wrapper library? In-Reply-To: <20181115053026.GA20617@thunk.org> Message-ID: References: <877ehjx447.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <875zx2vhpd.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20181113193859.GJ3505@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <5853c297-9d84-86e5-dede-aa2957562c6b@arm.com> <20181115053026.GA20617@thunk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) To SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > That's great. But is it or is it not true (either de jure or de > facto) that "a single active glibc developer" can block a system call > from being supported by glibc by objecting? And if not, under what is > the process by resolving a conflict? We use a consensus-building process as described at . -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com