From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06737C43381 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBB82082F for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731584AbfC1ADy (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:03:54 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:51964 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726173AbfC1ADy (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:03:54 -0400 Received: from p5492e2fc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.146.226.252] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1h9IWM-0005hk-1p; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:03:50 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:03:49 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: John Stultz cc: Paul Moore , Ondrej Mosnacek , Miroslav Lichvar , Stephen Boyd , linux-audit@redhat.com, Richard Guy Briggs , Steve Grubb , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak10 v6 0/2] audit: Log changes that can affect the system clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190307123254.348-1-omosnace@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, John Stultz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:50 AM Paul Moore wrote: > > These patches look fine to me, but it would be really nice to get an > > ACK from the time folks before I merge this into audit/next. Time > > folks, I know you've looked at previous versions of this patchset, can > > you give this a quick look to make sure everything is still okay from > > your perspective? > > > > Sorry for the slow response. I briefly looked it over and it seems > simple enough, so don't really have any objections. Though I don't > have as sharp an eye (or opinion :) as Thomas, so no promises he won't > step in with an issue. I did already :)