From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1F0C282CE for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 21:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033AA21855 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 21:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726479AbfDEVOC (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:14:02 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49943 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725973AbfDEVOC (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:14:02 -0400 Received: from p5492e2fc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.146.226.252] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hCW9t-000520-K2; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 23:13:57 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:13:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jian-Hong Pan cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@endlessm.com, Daniel Drake Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/reboot: Use efi reboot for Acer TravelMate X514-51T In-Reply-To: <20190401073514.2785-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> Message-ID: References: <20190401073514.2785-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Jian-Hong Pan wrote: > +/* > + * Some machines require the "reboot=e" commandline options > + */ > +static int __init set_efi_reboot(const struct dmi_system_id *d) > +{ > + if (reboot_type != BOOT_EFI) { > + reboot_type = BOOT_EFI; So if EFI is disabled in the kernel this will fall through to BOOT_BIOS. Is that intended behaviour? > + pr_info("%s series board detected. Selecting %s-method for reboot.\n", > + d->ident, "EFI"); Is thee a reason not to write "EFI" in the string itself? Thanks, tglx