From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 29/41] btrfs: ref-verify: Simplify stack trace retrieval
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:05:17 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904101404280.3479@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410113115.GB4610@linux-x5ow.site>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of
> > the storage array based interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> > Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> > Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> > Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c | 15 ++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
> > @@ -205,28 +205,17 @@ static struct root_entry *lookup_root_en
> > #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> > static void __save_stack_trace(struct ref_action *ra)
> > {
> > - struct stack_trace stack_trace;
> > -
> > - stack_trace.max_entries = MAX_TRACE;
> > - stack_trace.nr_entries = 0;
> > - stack_trace.entries = ra->trace;
> > - stack_trace.skip = 2;
> > - save_stack_trace(&stack_trace);
> > - ra->trace_len = stack_trace.nr_entries;
> > + ra->trace_len = stack_trace_save(ra->trace, MAX_TRACE, 2);
>
>
> Stupid question: why are you passing a '2' for 'skipnr' and in
> stack_trace_save() from your series you set stack_trace::skip as skipnr + 1.
>
> Wouldn't this result in a stack_trace::skip = 3? Or is it the number of
> functions to be skipped and you don't want to have stack_trace_save() saved as
> well?
Correct. The extra call will shift the skipped one up, so I compensate for that.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 10:27 [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 01/41] um/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX marker Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 02/41] x86/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:34 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 03/41] arm/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:35 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 04/41] sh/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:27 ` [RFC patch 05/41] unicore32/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:36 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 06/41] riscv/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:37 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 07/41] arm64/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 08/41] parisc/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:38 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 09/41] s390/stacktrace: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:39 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 10/41] lockdep: Remove the ULONG_MAX stack trace hackery Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 11/41] mm/slub: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:40 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 12/41] mm/page_owner: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:41 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 13/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-14 20:42 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 14/41] latency_top: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:42 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 15/41] drm: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 20:43 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 16/41] tracing: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 2:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 3:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-14 20:44 ` [tip:core/stacktrace] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 17/41] tracing: Make stack_trace_print() static and rename it Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 0:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 18/41] stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 19/41] lib/stackdepot: Provide functions which operate on plain storage arrays Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:39 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 20/41] backtrace-test: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 2:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 21/41] proc: Simplify task stack retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 14:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 22/41] latency_top: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 23/41] mm/slub: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 24/41] mm/kmemleak: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 25/41] mm/kasan: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-04-11 2:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-14 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-14 17:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 26/41] mm/page_owner: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 27/41] fault-inject: Simplify stacktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-10 12:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-11 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 3:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 29/41] btrfs: ref-verify: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 11:31 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:05 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-04-10 12:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-04-10 12:50 ` David Sterba
2019-04-10 13:47 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 30/41] dm bufio: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 31/41] dm persistent data: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 32/41] drm: Simplify stacktrace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 33/41] lockdep: Remove unused trace argument from print_circular_bug() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 34/41] lockdep: Move stack trace logic into check_prev_add() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 35/41] lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 36/41] tracing: Simplify stacktrace retrieval in histograms Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 37/41] tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 38/41] tracing: Make ftrace_trace_userstack() static and conditional Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 39/41] tracing: Simplify stack trace retrieval Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 40/41] stacktrace: Remove obsolete functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 3:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-11 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-11 13:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-10 10:28 ` [RFC patch 41/41] lib/stackdepot: " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 13:49 ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-04-10 11:49 ` [RFC patch 00/41] stacktrace: Avoid the pointless redirection through struct stack_trace Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1904101404280.3479@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).