From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7DAC282DD for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E7F217D7 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389534AbfDRPod (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:44:33 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:36837 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731317AbfDRPod (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:44:33 -0400 Received: from pd9ef12d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.18.210] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hH9Cj-0004qZ-CV; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:44:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:43:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt cc: LKML , Josh Poimboeuf , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Alexander Potapenko , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Catalin Marinas , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Mike Rapoport , Akinobu Mita , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Johannes Thumshirn , David Sterba , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer , Alasdair Kergon , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Joonas Lahtinen , Maarten Lankhorst , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter , Rodrigo Vivi , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch V2 21/29] tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently In-Reply-To: <20190418105334.5093528d@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: References: <20190418084119.056416939@linutronix.de> <20190418084254.999521114@linutronix.de> <20190418105334.5093528d@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:40 +0200 > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ftrace_stack, ftrace_stack); > > +/* This allows 8 level nesting which is plenty */ > > Can we make this 4 level nesting and increase the size? (I can see us > going more than 64 deep, kernel developers never cease to amaze me ;-) > That's all we need: > > Context: Normal, softirq, irq, NMI > > Is there any other way to nest? Not that I know, but you are the tracer dude :) Thanks, tglx