From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEA1C04A6B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 19:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA13206BF for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 19:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726915AbfEFTMX (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 15:12:23 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38869 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726145AbfEFTMX (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 15:12:23 -0400 Received: from p5de0b374.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.179.116] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hNj2D-0001Gs-AF; Mon, 06 May 2019 21:12:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 21:12:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Provide a pointer to the valid CPU mask In-Reply-To: <20190502151055.GA50195@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20190423142636.14347-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20190502151055.GA50195@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 May 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Looks good to me in principle - Peter, Thomas, any fundamental > objections? Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner