From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB5C43613 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6DA2073F for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727323AbfFXDBr (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 23:01:47 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:34569 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727290AbfFXDBo (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 23:01:44 -0400 Received: from p5b06daab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.171] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hfBBe-0007Rm-T9; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:42:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:42:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Fenghua Yu cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Ashok Raj , Tony Luck , Ravi V Shankar , linux-kernel , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/umwait: Document umwait control sysfs interfaces In-Reply-To: <1560994438-235698-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1560994438-235698-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1560994438-235698-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Fenghua Yu wrote: > +Description: Umwait control > + > + enable_c02: Read/write interface to control umwait C0.2 state > + Read returns C0.2 state status: > + 0: C0.2 is disabled > + 1: C0.2 is enabled > + > + Write 'Yy1' or [oO][nN] for on to enable C0.2 state. Write 'Yy1' ? You meant [Yy1] I assume. > + Write 'Nn0' or [oO][fF] for off to disable C0.2 state. What about avoiding all that unreadable confusion? Write 'y' or '1' or 'on' to enable C0.2 state. Write 'n' or '0' or 'of' to disable C0.2 state. The interface is case insensitive. Thanks, tglx