linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Cache number of online CPUs
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 22:42:17 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907042237010.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)

Revaluating the bitmap wheight of the online cpus bitmap in every
invocation of num_online_cpus() over and over is a pretty useless
exercise. Especially when num_online_cpus() is used in code pathes like the
IPI delivery of x86 or the membarrier code.

Cache the number of online CPUs in the core and just return the cached
variable.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h |   16 +++++++---------
 kernel/cpu.c            |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -95,8 +95,13 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
 #define cpu_present_mask  ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
 #define cpu_active_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
 
+extern unsigned int __num_online_cpus;
+
 #if NR_CPUS > 1
-#define num_online_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask)
+static inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
+{
+	return __num_online_cpus;
+}
 #define num_possible_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
 #define num_present_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask)
 #define num_active_cpus()	cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask)
@@ -821,14 +826,7 @@ set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool p
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_present_mask);
 }
 
-static inline void
-set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
-{
-	if (online)
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
-	else
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask);
-}
+void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
 
 static inline void
 set_cpu_active(unsigned int cpu, bool active)
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2291,6 +2291,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);
 struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_active_mask);
 
+unsigned int __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
+
 void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
 {
 	cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
@@ -2306,6 +2309,19 @@ void init_cpu_online(const struct cpumas
 	cpumask_copy(&__cpu_online_mask, src);
 }
 
+void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+	if (online) {
+		if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask))
+			__num_online_cpus++;
+	} else {
+		if (cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_online_mask))
+			__num_online_cpus--;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Activate the first processor.
  */

             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-04 20:42 Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-07-04 20:59 ` [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Cache number of online CPUs Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-04 21:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 22:00     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-04 22:33       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 23:34         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-05  8:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-07-05 15:38             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-05 20:53               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 21:00                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-06 23:24                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-08 13:43                   ` [PATCH V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-08 14:07                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-08 14:20                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-09 14:23                         ` [PATCH V3] " Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-09 15:52                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-22  7:58                           ` [tip:smp/hotplug] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-25 14:11                           ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1907042237010.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).