From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7B4C43331 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 20:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19C206A5 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 20:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406307AbfIGUo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 16:44:59 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:49657 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404588AbfIGUo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 16:44:59 -0400 Received: from p5de0b6c5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.182.197] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1i6hZo-0001mK-TF; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:44:57 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 22:44:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds cc: Chris Wilson , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Bandan Das Subject: Re: Linux 5.3-rc7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <156785100521.13300.14461504732265570003@skylake-alporthouse-com> <156786727951.13300.15226856788926071603@skylake-alporthouse-com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 7 Sep 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 8:00 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > So why wouldn't we just revert it? That's what I just replied to Chris. Can you do it right away or should I queue it up? Thanks, tglx