linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:48:49 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911071447090.4256@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hDaxcPBwwx2FaxKKJGNOvY_+JuvF7CJ0tbX1TjEisvUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:57 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> I have waited for comments on x86 bits from Thomas, but since they are
> not coming, I have just decided to take patch [1/12] from this series,
> which should be totally non-controversial,  as keeping it out of the
> tree has become increasingly painful (material depending on it has
> been piling up already for some time).

Sorry for letting this slip through the cracks.

From x86 side I don't see any issues. It's mostly EFI stuff which Ard has
looked at already. So feel free to pick up the lot

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07  1:42 [PATCH v8 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:42 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] x86/efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] efi: Common enable/disable infrastructure for EFI soft reservation Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] arm/efi: EFI soft reservation to memblock Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] x86/efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] lib: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] dax: Fix alloc_dax_region() compile warning Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level Dan Williams
2019-11-07  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] acpi/numa/hmat: Register "soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device Dan Williams
2019-11-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-07 13:48   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-11-07 14:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1911071447090.4256@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).