From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7827EC43217 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237299AbiEJWqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 18:46:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237290AbiEJWqb (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 18:46:31 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E904218FEF; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1AE3D9200C4; Wed, 11 May 2022 00:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A549200C1; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:46:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 23:46:26 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Stephen Rothwell cc: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tty tree In-Reply-To: <20220511075804.79c5b697@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20220511075804.79c5b697@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 May 2022, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the tty tree, yesterday's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced > these warnings: Umm, sorry about that. I wasn't even aware files under Documentation/ are meant to be processed somehow other than through eyeballs nowadays! I'll see how to fix the file up and will make the necessary corrections, but how shall I post the update? A replacement patch or an incremental change? Thanks for letting me know. Maciej