From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD708C28CC3 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 05:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807C620825 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 05:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="fTGcb3xX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726343AbfFGFML (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 01:12:11 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com ([209.85.219.195]:33172 "EHLO mail-yb1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725497AbfFGFML (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 01:12:11 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w127so356028yba.0 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 22:12:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=h725Opt78hWUyZOZqX4v0aqrQEDyoY/2hkomdBMgZww=; b=fTGcb3xXFdKONaPH9oQkjj23XRMg52QneHQ3o1/4KqrqzSi12zcaigy3bSDfyazyLb Yv+wiciiZCv/vzQSO6JHLgU4RlC3O5041wRfg/AzvszqmwncR+0lIW5ICXpf4Ex55m9k 9gF9bl4930Bgid8pc3kehhY4qG1W2vCxcvtSjiyXPS34bIzB6ccC+c1A1whp80FT9+dl 1Lss1mEbGdGzUxbM9AK0zHSTa5V11ydtv8qyKgarRrJ6OMwUha1UBHYqXgjsNDIqDLpr LXT4RbfkLpuxNPDXSIv+jUiyebXiKmdx2bromMdczIgNi2DEcHc/LgWpXmzjigwRZIrZ OTww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=h725Opt78hWUyZOZqX4v0aqrQEDyoY/2hkomdBMgZww=; b=ST+jwwOeNw/TSUzC3YSfvmg0jx7eAUqgJHFGI60foQ7APDfaEl23xcs3xEV3sP5H6A Tal2+RDOCy7D3dNwjl+Cbox0sNGW1kEEs4u3T16iNxUVjXtauCRshIV79+Zmw3KoOpJS l2r0a6lQNktun42EgLxNKYFbZ8GpAfbbhUlHaALzCrQGYpBc5h7dIl3Cknye3D8Rv4XB MOiTHTiw8jwBF+GtIkoDCapyU59wFRFJyAHcvx9n58fBQle6ocyVl9fbpI/LwacKdyvZ mqGQag/OAK2Hgus9M9LmHeAhAoEc8OlU2lmffoMhaFRzHCRVwka3C9hgmWtvYEIaeAPB xC/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3zQoLa6FDZIkSZ6bKZuZzryhSQ2A6sr5FbzRzaHdUQfh2OxAD f4gOSfPaguta1MbN/GJBsZKf2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9Ntq0WkyHFD6oP3tUDeWJS3376kczaCJoqdE1ou8pDAsvwRtVSzBjiAcz48pEQTefOP7PkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a25:bc05:: with SMTP id i5mr22535739ybh.335.1559884330298; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 22:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([14.141.105.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm282977ywe.81.2019.06.06.22.12.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Jun 2019 22:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 22:12:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Loys Ollivier cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] arch: riscv: add support for building DTB files from DT source data In-Reply-To: <86v9xlh0x8.fsf@baylibre.com> Message-ID: References: <20190602080500.31700-1-paul.walmsley@sifive.com> <20190602080500.31700-2-paul.walmsley@sifive.com> <86v9xlh0x8.fsf@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Loys Ollivier wrote: > Always build it ? > Any particular reason to drop ARCH_SIFIVE ? Palmer had some reservations about it, so I dropped it for now. But then as I was thinking about it, I remembered that I also had some reservations about it, years ago: that everyone should use CONFIG_SOC_* for this, rather than CONFIG_ARCH. CONFIG_ARCH_* seems better reserved for CPU architectures. If you agree, would you like to send a followup series, based on the DT patches, to make the SiFive DT file builds depend on CONFIG_SOC_* instead? Thanks for the comment, - Paul