From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DD5C4332F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230222AbiKBHFo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:05:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33604 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230197AbiKBHFg (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:05:36 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE2F1DDF7; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:05:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=+ff4znqwIZoXohUvIKNT0EbfCtlyW/3kc/qOs3Vln9I=; b=XYoxH/inCwePyGL2wNXhyAEmag8/xhSQk/q0P4Wl3tioL/4QAedmERoK /p3jv/QLcgU5uVQWRM+1pjQNlRFvBY1X2JB0pxF9UpuDaeW1T/77Td9wE 7wFnIKqEeaO1Qe3YFtSC/gKXiVMxQFCybQOx4oBodmkshr7+qmrz53ElI c=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=julia.lawall@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,232,1661810400"; d="scan'208";a="72566726" Received: from 51.123.68.85.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.123.51]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2022 08:05:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:05:32 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Christophe JAILLET cc: Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/30] nvme: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <2e8d7f2f3cb754982f5fe99f2e13cf72db9d6dba.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <20221102064747.GA8903@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1625700783-1667372732=:3225" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1625700783-1667372732=:3225 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 2 Nov 2022, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 02/11/2022 à 07:47, Christoph Hellwig a écrit : > > What are th other 29 patches doing in this series? Due to the lack of > > context individual patches from series have to through /dev/null here, > > sorry. > > > > Hi, > > in each patch, in order to give some context, I wrote: > --- > This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool(). > Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones. > > The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool(). > > You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is > available at [1]. > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/ > > > What is the best strategy for sending such patches? I send the cover letter to everyone. The problem with sending individual unconnected patches is that people who are looking at the patches on generic mailing lists can't easily see that they should just skip over all of them at once. But it is hard to please everyone for this issue... julia > > Should I send only individual patches? > Should everybody be in copy of all patches? Or at least of the cover letter? > > > Some patches have already been Acked or even applied. So I'll wait a bit so > that things stabilize before resending what is remaining. > > CJ > --8323329-1625700783-1667372732=:3225--