From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7A1C433DF for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 04:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAAC20575 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 04:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725979AbgENEfN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 00:35:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55536 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725806AbgENEfN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 00:35:13 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 460 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Wed, 13 May 2020 21:35:13 PDT Received: from trent.utfs.org (trent.utfs.org [IPv6:2a03:3680:0:3::67]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617F8C061A0C for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 21:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by trent.utfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BDE463A86; Thu, 14 May 2020 06:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:27:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Kujau To: kernel test robot cc: Jia-Ju Bai , shaggy@kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, Markus.Elfring@web.de Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [fs] 05c5a0273b: netperf.Throughput_total_tps -71.8% regression In-Reply-To: <20200512030929.GA5770@shao2-debian> Message-ID: References: <20200512030929.GA5770@shao2-debian> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 395 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 May 2020, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed a -71.8% regression of netperf.Throughput_total_tps due to commit: As noted in this report, netperf is used to "measure various aspect of networking performance". Are we sure the bisect is correct? JFS is a filesystem and is not touching net/ in any way. So, having not attempted to reproduce this, maybe the JFS commit is a red herring? C. -- BOFH excuse #50: Change in Earth's rotational speed