From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] timekeeping: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:56:52 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103131455320.2787@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103122217.34004.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> The timekeeping subsystem uses a sysdev class and a sysdev for
> executing timekeeping_suspend() after interrupts have been turned off
> on the boot CPU (during system suspend) and for executing
> timekeeping_resume() before turning on interrupts on the boot CPU
> (during system resume). However, since both of these functions
> ignore their arguments, the entire mechanism may be replaced with a
> struct syscore_ops object which is simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-13 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 0:31 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Allow subsystems to avoid using sysdevs for defining "core" PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-10 0:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Introduce struct syscore_ops and related functionality Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-10 3:33 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-03-10 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-10 11:30 ` [RFC][Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-11 17:11 ` Greg KH
2011-03-11 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-11 20:16 ` Greg KH
2011-03-11 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-10 0:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Convert several sysdev users to using struct syscore_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-11 17:12 ` Greg KH
2011-03-11 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-11 20:33 ` Greg KH
2011-03-11 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-10 13:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Allow subsystems to avoid using sysdevs for defining "core" PM callbacks Kay Sievers
2011-03-10 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / Core: Introcude struct syscore_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 14:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-13 15:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] ACPI: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-18 21:38 ` Len Brown
2011-03-12 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] timekeeping: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 13:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-03-13 15:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI / Intel IOMMU: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-02 17:30 ` Tony Luck
2011-06-06 17:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-06 17:58 ` Luck, Tony
2011-03-12 21:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] cpufreq: Use syscore_ops for boot CPU suspend/resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-15 21:43 ` [Update, v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] Introduce ARCH_NO_SYSDEV_OPS config option Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 13:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-13 15:30 ` [Update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 13:02 ` [PATCH 9-10/10] Allow subsystems to avoid using sysdevs for defining "core" PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 13:03 ` [PATCH 9/10] sh: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev R. J. Wysocki
2011-03-17 8:20 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-19 0:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 14:04 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-22 14:19 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 20:39 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 21:12 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 21:49 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-22 22:00 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 22:44 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 23:46 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 23:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-23 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-22 22:23 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-23 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-23 11:28 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-22 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 22:20 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 22:56 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 23:05 ` Kay Sievers
2011-03-22 23:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-23 9:59 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-23 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-13 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdevs for PM in timer and leds Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-14 9:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-03-14 19:54 ` [Update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-21 23:31 ` [PATCH 0/6] Do not use sysdevs for implementing "core" PM operations on x86 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-21 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-21 23:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-21 23:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI / Intel IOMMU: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 10:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-03-22 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-23 7:48 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-03-21 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 9:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 23:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: Use syscore_ops for boot CPU suspend/resume (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-21 23:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] Introduce ARCH_NO_SYSDEV_OPS config option (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-22 10:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] Do not use sysdevs for implementing "core" PM operations on x86 Ingo Molnar
2011-03-22 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-25 22:51 ` [GIT PULL] More power management updates for 2.6.39 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1103131455320.2787@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).