From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757114Ab1CaHVf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:21:35 -0400
Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:39605 "EHLO
	relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757044Ab1CaHVd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:21:33 -0400
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimZ8+npVu6u5-o9+3CV40wB_GYwiOWvfJPso8G0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103310317050.28032@xanadu.home>
References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com>
 <AANLkTimWbb5DWiiCW821H6pRicbk1fS3PYcnGyUMznvM@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <201103301906.42429.arnd@arndb.de>
 <AANLkTim578-kwM14SJd06RW_QiC4WVCmFuG+ASgGC4sq@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103301531420.28032@xanadu.home>
 <AANLkTim6zg-U6HtAQbqnENqoK7x8erXSqOuTFVC0YE5r@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103301814250.28032@xanadu.home>
 <AANLkTimZ8+npVu6u5-o9+3CV40wB_GYwiOWvfJPso8G0@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:31, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> wrote:
> > On ARM there is simply not such thing as a single machine design to
> > clone, and a closed source test bench to design for.
> 
> There are other architectures that didn't start from a single root platform,
> but still support multi-platform kernels.

Sure, so does ARM with some restrictions.


Nicolas