linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	dhillf@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kthread: Prevent unpark race which puts threads on the wrong cpu
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:38:25 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1304091635430.21884@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1304081415570.21884@ionos>

The smpboot threads rely on the park/unpark mechanism which binds per
cpu threads on a particular core. Though the functionality is racy:

CPU0	       	 	CPU1  	     	    CPU2
unpark(T)				    wake_up_process(T)
  clear(SHOULD_PARK)	T runs
			leave parkme() due to !SHOULD_PARK  
  bind_to(CPU2)		BUG_ON(wrong CPU)						    

We cannot let the tasks move themself to the target CPU as one of
those tasks is actually the migration thread itself, which requires
that it starts running on the target cpu right away.

The only rock solid solution to this problem is to prevent wakeups in
park state which are not from unpark(). That way we can guarantee that
the association of the task to the target cpu is working correctly.

Add a new task state (TASK_PARKED) which prevents other wakeups and
use this state explicitely for the unpark wakeup.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 fs/proc/array.c       |    1 +
 include/linux/sched.h |    5 +++--
 kernel/kthread.c      |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const char * const task_state_arr
 	"x (dead)",		/*  64 */
 	"K (wakekill)",		/* 128 */
 	"W (waking)",		/* 256 */
+	"P (parked)",		/* 512 */
 };
 
 static inline const char *get_task_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -163,9 +163,10 @@ print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu
 #define TASK_DEAD		64
 #define TASK_WAKEKILL		128
 #define TASK_WAKING		256
-#define TASK_STATE_MAX		512
+#define TASK_PARKED		512
+#define TASK_STATE_MAX		1024
 
-#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtZXxKW"
+#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtZXxKWP"
 
 extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
 		sizeof(TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR)-1 != ilog2(TASK_STATE_MAX)+1)];
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/kthread.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/kthread.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ void *kthread_data(struct task_struct *t
 
 static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self)
 {
-	__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	__set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
 	while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) {
 		if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags))
 			complete(&self->parked);
 		schedule();
-		__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		__set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
 	}
 	clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags);
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
@@ -324,6 +324,22 @@ static struct kthread *task_get_live_kth
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static void __kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *k, struct kthread *kthread)
+{
+	clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+	/*
+	 * We clear the IS_PARKED bit here as we don't wait
+	 * until the task has left the park code. So if we'd
+	 * park before that happens we'd see the IS_PARKED bit
+	 * which might be about to be cleared.
+	 */
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
+		if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
+			__kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu);
+		wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * kthread_unpark - unpark a thread created by kthread_create().
  * @k:		thread created by kthread_create().
@@ -336,20 +352,8 @@ void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *
 {
 	struct kthread *kthread = task_get_live_kthread(k);
 
-	if (kthread) {
-		clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
-		/*
-		 * We clear the IS_PARKED bit here as we don't wait
-		 * until the task has left the park code. So if we'd
-		 * park before that happens we'd see the IS_PARKED bit
-		 * which might be about to be cleared.
-		 */
-		if (test_and_clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
-			if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
-				__kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu);
-			wake_up_process(k);
-		}
-	}
+	if (kthread)
+		__kthread_unpark(k, kthread);
 	put_task_struct(k);
 }
 
@@ -407,7 +411,7 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k)
 	trace_sched_kthread_stop(k);
 	if (kthread) {
 		set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags);
-		clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+		__kthread_unpark(k, kthread);
 		wake_up_process(k);
 		wait_for_completion(&kthread->exited);
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-05 21:43 kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134! Dave Hansen
2013-04-06  7:12 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-06  8:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-07  9:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-07  9:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-08  9:24         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-08 11:55           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-08 12:17             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-09 14:38               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-04-09 15:55                 ` [PATCH] kthread: Prevent unpark race which puts threads on the wrong cpu Dave Hansen
2013-04-09 18:43                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-09 19:30                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-09 20:38                       ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-09 20:54                         ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-10  8:29                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-10 10:51                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-10 19:41                             ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-11 10:19                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 10:48                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11 11:43                                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11 11:59                                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11 12:51                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 12:54                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 13:46                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 18:07                                 ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-11 19:48                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-10 14:03                   ` [PATCH] CPU hotplug, smpboot: Fix crash in smpboot_thread_fn() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11  8:10                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 10:19                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11 19:16                 ` [PATCH] kthread: Prevent unpark race which puts threads on the wrong cpu Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-11 20:47                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-11 21:19                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-12 10:59                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-12 11:26                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-04-15 19:49                         ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-12 10:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-12 12:32                 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1304091635430.21884@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).