From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935871Ab3BTPnV (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:43:21 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:29486 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935543Ab3BTPnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:43:19 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:43:18 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "Woodhouse, David" Cc: Kim Phillips , Russell King - ARM Linux , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Daniel Santos , David Rientjes , Rusty Russell , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function In-reply-to: <1361372008.13482.280.camel@i7.infradead.org> Message-id: References: <20130129181046.GC25415@pd.tnic> <1359703995.23531.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130205210436.670c62e26d2121330e87af35@freescale.com> <1360141322.6066.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130206191905.ac8eb6743e69425f30888704@freescale.com> <20130207181315.GM17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1360344301.6066.263.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1360363233.6066.283.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130208191208.2ef3d78bda71aa7b44d00d7b@freescale.com> <20130219203115.114eab79e8d2099c6306d921@freescale.com> <1361356696.13482.269.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1361367842.13482.279.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1361372008.13482.280.camel@i7.infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Woodhouse, David wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:06 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Woodhouse, David wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > You'll have the same issue wrt the above whether or not the source > > > > file is C or assembly. > > > > > > Hm, true. I was thinking of the code itself (which is > > > position-independent anyway), rather than the flags in the object file. > > > > > > So just ship a .S file and for the decompressor (if we need it at all) > > > rebuild it just the same as we do the *other* libgcc code like ashldi3.S > > > etc. > > > > ... in which case there is no harm shipping a .c file and trivially > > enforcing -O2, the rest being equal. > > For today's compilers, unless the wind changes. We'll adapt if necessary. Going with -O2 should remain pretty safe anyway. Nicolas