From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>,
"Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus@oberhumer.com>,
Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org,
Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@openedhand.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@gmail.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>,
Egon Alter <egon.alter@gmx.net>,
hyojun.im@lge.com, chan.jeong@lge.com,
raphael.andy.lee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:08:53 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1302271055430.1254@syhkavp.arg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361980152.2035.13.camel@joe-AO722>
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Joe Perches wrote:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/145
Connecting to lkml.org (lkml.org)|87.253.128.182|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Server Error
> I did not and do not see significant value in
> adding LZ4 given Markus' LZO improvements.
Please someone post a comprehensive comparison with all the results in
the same email.
> The new LZO code is faster than ever and it's
> a standalone improvement.
>
> Why would the LZO code not be updated?
It is used by filesystems, etc. So of course it needs to be updated to
faster code.
> Markus has posted what seems a clean git pull
> request. It was not cc'd to arm or linux-arch.
>
> http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/GIT-PULL-Update-LZO-compression-code-for-v3-9-td605184.html
Maybe a reminder should be sent to Linus about this.
>From the above we can see this:
**LZO-2013-UA : updated LZO version available in linux-next plus
experimental ARM Unaligned Access patch. This needs approval from
some ARM maintainer ist NOT YET INCLUDED.
What is that experimental patch in need of approval?
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 6:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] decompressor: Add LZ4 decompressor module Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 13:12 ` David Sterba
2013-02-27 4:38 ` Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] lib: Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 14:00 ` David Sterba
2013-02-28 5:22 ` Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm: " Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] x86: " Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-26 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] " Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
2013-02-26 20:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-26 21:58 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-26 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-26 22:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 1:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-27 9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 15:49 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-27 16:08 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2013-02-27 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 16:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-27 17:04 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-27 17:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-27 17:39 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-27 17:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-27 17:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 17:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-28 4:22 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-27 7:36 ` Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-27 9:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 10:20 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2013-02-27 15:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-27 13:23 ` Kyungsik Lee
2013-02-27 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.03.1302271055430.1254@syhkavp.arg \
--to=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com \
--cc=celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org \
--cc=chan.jeong@lge.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=egon.alter@gmx.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hyojun.im@lge.com \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=jmillenbach@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kyungsik.lee@lge.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=markus@oberhumer.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=nitingupta910@gmail.com \
--cc=raphael.andy.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rpurdie@openedhand.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).