From: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:08:24 +0100 (CET) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1103212105490.15815@swampdragon.chaosbits.net> (raw) I believe that the majority of systems we are built on want a -O2 compiled kernel. Optimizing for size (-Os) is mainly benneficial for embedded systems and systems with very small CPU caches (correct me if I'm wrong). So it seems wrong to me that CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE defaults to 'y' and recommends saying 'Y' if unsure. I believe it should default to 'n' and recommend that if unsure. People who bennefit from -Os know who they are and can enable the option if needed/wanted - the majority shouldn't select this. Right? Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> --- Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 56240e7..0d63dfa 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -903,12 +903,12 @@ endif config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE bool "Optimize for size" - default y + default n help Enabling this option will pass "-Os" instead of "-O2" to gcc resulting in a smaller kernel. - If unsure, say Y. + If unsure, say N. config SYSCTL bool -- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 20:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-03-21 20:08 Jesper Juhl [this message] 2011-03-22 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt 2011-03-22 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg 2011-03-22 8:25 ` Jesper Juhl 2011-03-22 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar 2011-03-22 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-03-23 17:45 ` Andi Kleen 2011-03-23 21:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1103212105490.15815@swampdragon.chaosbits.net \ --to=jj@chaosbits.net \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \ --cc=eparis@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@elte.hu \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \ --subject='Re: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).