From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755362Ab1CVI0H (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:26:07 -0400 Received: from swampdragon.chaosbits.net ([90.184.90.115]:29348 "EHLO swampdragon.chaosbits.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753875Ab1CVI0F (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:26:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:25:56 +0100 (CET) From: Jesper Juhl To: Pekka Enberg cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Lezcano , Eric Paris , Roman Zippel , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I believe that the majority of systems we are built on want a -O2 compiled > > kernel. Optimizing for size (-Os) is mainly benneficial for embedded > > systems and systems with very small CPU caches (correct me if I'm wrong). > > Please take a look at commit 0910b44 ("Expose "Optimize for size" > option for everybody") for the reasoning behind defaulting to -Os. > Thank you for that pointer Pekka. I guess I need to update my view on -Os. -- Jesper Juhl http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.