From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755967Ab3DTXqV (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:46:21 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59274 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755913Ab3DTXqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:46:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 01:46:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Alexander Holler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Alessandro Zummo , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time In-Reply-To: <1366384452-14367-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> Message-ID: References: <1366384452-14367-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Alexander Holler wrote: > as I'm not sure if the maintainer of the RTC subsystem is active again, > I've added the people which where involved with rtc-hid-sensor-time > before to cc too. That might be a good idea even he is active again, > as the driver depends on hid-sensor-hub and as such works a bit > outside the stuff other RTC drivers do use. Agreed. I'd say let's wait if RTC maintainer(s) step up and have anything to say to this patchset. If there's a silence, it'll probably be ok taking it through my review process and my tree, but at least for 3/3 I'd definitely like to have Ack from someone else as well. For this reason, this is likely not be 3.10 material, but 3.11. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs