From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755219AbaJWKtN (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:49:13 -0400 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:39402 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755187AbaJWKtL (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:49:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:49:07 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , David Miller , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: fix blk-mq for SPI hosts In-Reply-To: <20141023084530.GB20233@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <1413731638-28305-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20141023084530.GB20233@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LRH 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > ping? Sorry, forgot to reply. Yes, it worked fine, on the initial Ultra 1 and additionally on Ultra 2 too. > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:13:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Fix the assumption that we can treat all blk-mq requests as tagged. For > > traditional SCSI that's wrong, as being tagged has a very explicit meaning > > on the wire. > > > > This is a little bit different from the version Meelis tested earlier, but > > the concept is the same. I didn't want to add a Tested-by tag as it's > > different enough, though. > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ---end quoted text--- > -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)