From: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: PPro arch_cpu_idle: NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 1
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:06:41 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1703020006260.1113@math.ut.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703011801420.4005@nanos>
> > This is on my trusty IBM PC365, dual Pentium Pro. 4.10 worked fine,
> > 4.10.0-09686-g9e314890292c and 4.10.0-10770-g2d6be4abf514 exhibit a
> > problem. Ocassionally NMI watchdog kicks in and discovers one of the
> > CPUs in LOCKUP. The system keeps running fine. The first lockup was
> > different, all the others were from arch_cpu_idle. Sometime ecey couple
> > of seconds (after some activity), sometimes nothing for a long time
> > (idle, no SSH logins).
>
> The only watchdog related patch which hit after 4.10 is:
>
> 8dcde9def5a1 kernel/watchdog.c: do not hardcode CPU 0 as the initial thread
>
> Can you try to revert that for a start? I'm not seeing why it should be the
> culprit from a quick glance, but ...
Reverting this patch does not help.
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-01 15:28 PPro arch_cpu_idle: NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 1 Meelis Roos
2017-03-01 17:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-01 20:47 ` Meelis Roos
2017-03-01 22:06 ` Meelis Roos [this message]
2017-03-01 22:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-02 16:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-02 19:40 ` Meelis Roos
2017-03-03 10:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-03 10:58 ` Meelis Roos
2017-03-05 20:48 ` Meelis Roos
2017-03-05 23:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-06 11:42 ` Meelis Roos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.20.1703020006260.1113@math.ut.ee \
--to=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).