From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750899AbdLGH0h (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:26:37 -0500 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:53696 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744AbdLGH0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:26:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:26:31 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos To: Viresh Kumar cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rafael Wysocki , Linux PM , Vincent Guittot , "4 . 14+" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay_us to 20 ms In-Reply-To: <20171207044019.kxwusyl5qoxq7zta@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> Message-ID: References: <20171207044019.kxwusyl5qoxq7zta@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 06-12-17, 20:21, Meelis Roos wrote: > > 30000 was not reliable. > > > > I created root cron job > > @reboot sleep 120; /sbin/reboot > > > > and by the evening it was dead again. > > > > Will try 50000 tomorrow. > > Lets make it similar to what it was before my original patch modified > it, to avoid all corner cases. > > Please test against 200 ms, 200000 value here. Sorry, I confused 200000 vs 20000, will test 200000. But 200000 was the value before. Shall I test 200000 with or without the other limiting patch? -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)