From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932090AbeDYSpy (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:45:54 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:58234 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751084AbeDYSpv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:45:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:44:38 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: David Herrmann cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore , teg@jklm.no, Stephen Smalley , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce LSM-hook for socketpair(2) In-Reply-To: <20180423133015.5455-1-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20180423133015.5455-1-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, David Herrmann wrote: > This patch series tries to close this gap and makes both behave the > same. A new LSM-hook is added which allows LSMs to cache the correct > peer information on newly created socket-pairs. Looks okay to me. Once it's respun with the Smack backend and maybe the hook name change, I'll merge this unless DaveM wants it to go in via his networking tree. -- James Morris