From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C92DC46460 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DC8208C3 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726660AbfEMSWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 14:22:53 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:38910 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725928AbfEMSWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 14:22:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x4DIMpN5005114; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:22:52 GMT Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 04:22:51 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Linus Torvalds cc: LSM List , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] security subsystem: Tomoyo updates for v5.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 May 2019, James Morris wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So now these have been very recently rebased (on top of a random > > merge-window "tree of the day" version) instead of having multiple > > merges. > > > > That makes the history cleaner, but has its own issues. > > These are just plain patches from the author, they were not part of any > publicly accessible tree -- there's nowhere they could be merged from. The reason I created a new branch in this case was that the existing one had the same issue as the TPM branch. -- James Morris