From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321BC433FF for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE492067D for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727136AbfHLW3g (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:29:36 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:40112 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726895AbfHLW3f (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:29:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7CMTXBN016632; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:29:33 GMT Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:29:33 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Matthew Garrett cc: LSM List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API Subject: Re: [PATCH V38 00/29] security: Add support for locking down the kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190808000721.124691-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:08 PM James Morris wrote: > > > Please verify and test, as I had to make a few minor fixups for my v5.2 > > > base. > > > > Thanks James - there's a few small fixups required, would you like > > those as separate patches or should I just send you a fixed copy of > > the original patchset? > > Given there are a few, an updated copy of the patchset will be best. Actually, that's a lot of patches to resend, just send updates against my next-lockdown branch. -- James Morris