linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] security: device_cgroup RCU warning fix
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 06:21:29 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2009160619400.8445@namei.org> (raw)

This was posted a while back and been baking in -next for a while, please 
consider for 5.9.


The following changes since commit bcf876870b95592b52519ed4aafcf9d95999bc9c:

  Linux 5.8 (2020-08-02 14:21:45 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git tags/fixes-v5.9a

for you to fetch changes up to bc62d68e2a0a69fcdcf28aca8edb01abf306b698:

  device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning (2020-08-20 11:25:03 -0700)

----------------------------------------------------------------
device_cgroup RCU warning fix from Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>

----------------------------------------------------------------

Amol Grover (1):
      device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning

 security/device_cgroup.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


commit bc62d68e2a0a69fcdcf28aca8edb01abf306b698
Author: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 6 16:29:50 2020 +0530

    device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning
    
    exceptions may be traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu()
    outside of an RCU read side critical section BUT under the
    protection of decgroup_mutex. Hence add the corresponding
    lockdep expression to fix the following false-positive
    warning:
    
    [    2.304417] =============================
    [    2.304418] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
    [    2.304420] 5.5.4-stable #17 Tainted: G            E
    [    2.304422] -----------------------------
    [    2.304424] security/device_cgroup.c:355 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
    
    Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

diff --git a/security/device_cgroup.c b/security/device_cgroup.c
index 43ab0ad45c1b..04375df52fc9 100644
--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ static bool match_exception_partial(struct list_head *exceptions, short type,
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, exceptions, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, exceptions, list,
+				lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex)) {
 		if ((type & DEVCG_DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEVCG_DEV_BLOCK))
 			continue;
 		if ((type & DEVCG_DEV_CHAR) && !(ex->type & DEVCG_DEV_CHAR))

             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-15 20:21 James Morris [this message]
2020-09-16 19:00 ` [GIT PULL] security: device_cgroup RCU warning fix pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.2009160619400.8445@namei.org \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).