From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756070AbcGHSi3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:38:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:33438 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752461AbcGHSi0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:38:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:38:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@eggly.anvils To: Dave Hansen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, mgorman@techsingularity.net, hughd@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys In-Reply-To: <20160707124719.3F04C882@viggo.jf.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20160707124719.3F04C882@viggo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Dave Hansen wrote: > I'm resending these because Ingo has said that he'd "love to have > some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI extensions." > The only changes to the code in months have been in the selftests. > So, if anyone has been putting off taking a look at these, I'd > appreciate a look now. Please expect nothing from me. I've paid no attention to memory protection keys, and they're way off my radar of interest. Sorry, if I spend my time looking at stuff I have little to contribute to, then I'm left with no time at all for what I should really be doing. Hugh