From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935708AbcLUP3Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:29:25 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45548 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935590AbcLUP3X (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:29:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:29:19 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes To: Josh Poimboeuf cc: Jessica Yu , Jiri Kosina , Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Heiko Carstens , x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik , Jiri Slaby , Chris J Arges , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] livepatch/s390: reorganize TIF thread flag bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > From: Jiri Slaby > > Group the TIF thread flag bits by their inclusion in the _TIF_WORK and > _TIF_TRACE macros. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf I believe there is no harm doing that and we need it for _TIF_PATCH_PENDING later. Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes Miroslav