From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751788AbdBAIzG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 1 Feb 2017 03:55:06 -0500
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33223 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751420AbdBAIzF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 1 Feb 2017 03:55:05 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:54:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] livepatch: add /proc/<pid>/patch_state
In-Reply-To: <20170131145654.hzbxahqr4rz6r5f2@treble>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1702010951520.24423@pobox.suse.cz>
References: <cover.1484839971.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <2c3b793fc23910f8fe15033b2b35e53b0b5dbaf3.1484839971.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1701311518290.3719@pobox.suse.cz> <20170131145654.hzbxahqr4rz6r5f2@treble>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:31:39PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > 
> > > Expose the per-task patch state value so users can determine which tasks
> > > are holding up completion of a patching operation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  fs/proc/base.c                     | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > > index 72624a1..85c501b 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Table of Contents
> > >    3.8   /proc/<pid>/fdinfo/<fd> - Information about opened file
> > >    3.9   /proc/<pid>/map_files - Information about memory mapped files
> > >    3.10  /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns - Task timerslack value
> > > +  3.11	/proc/<pid>/patch_state - Livepatch patch operation state
> > >  
> > >    4	Configuring procfs
> > >    4.1	Mount options
> > > @@ -1886,6 +1887,23 @@ Valid values are from 0 - ULLONG_MAX
> > >  An application setting the value must have PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS level
> > >  permissions on the task specified to change its timerslack_ns value.
> > >  
> > > +3.11	/proc/<pid>/patch_state - Livepatch patch operation state
> > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > +When CONFIG_LIVEPATCH is enabled, this file displays the value of the
> > > +patch state for the task.
> > > +
> > > +A value of '-1' indicates that no patch is in transition.
> > > +
> > > +A value of '0' indicates that a patch is in transition and the task is
> > > +unpatched.  If the patch is being enabled, then the task hasn't been
> > > +patched yet.  If the patch is being disabled, then the task has already
> > > +been unpatched.
> > > +
> > > +A value of '1' indicates that a patch is in transition and the task is
> > > +patched.  If the patch is being enabled, then the task has already been
> > > +patched.  If the patch is being disabled, then the task hasn't been
> > > +unpatched yet.
> > > +
> > 
> > Despite my review I thought about this some more. I think the logic make 
> > sense internally but when exposed it can be confusing. We do not export 
> > klp_target_state value, so users have to know if a patch is being enabled 
> > or disabled. Of course, they should know that, but I guess they'd like to 
> > use an userspace tool for this. Such tool needs to look at 
> > /proc/<pid>/patch_state to find out which tasks are blocking the 
> > completion and that is it. No more information anywhere.
> > 
> > We can either export klp_target_state, or change /proc/<pid>/patch_state 
> > to show only two states - task is in transition (1), task is patched (0).
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> Isn't this information already available in
> /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/{enabled,transition}?

transition no. That only gives the hint that something is happening with 
the patch. But yes, enabled is the one I wanted. I don't know how I missed 
that. Combined with /proc/<pid>/task it is exactly what a tool needs.

Miroslav