From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755313AbdKCIC7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 04:02:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48182 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752596AbdKCICy (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 04:02:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:02:50 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes To: Josh Poimboeuf cc: jeyu@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, lpechacek@suse.cz, pavel@ucw.cz, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks In-Reply-To: <20171102130916.y4jl5a2tuhkivpcr@treble> Message-ID: References: <20171031114853.841-1-mbenes@suse.cz> <20171031114853.841-2-mbenes@suse.cz> <20171102130916.y4jl5a2tuhkivpcr@treble> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:48:52PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > + > > +/* > > + * Sends a fake signal to all non-kthread tasks with TIF_PATCH_PENDING set. > > + * Kthreads with TIF_PATCH_PENDING set are woken up. Only admin can request this > > + * action currently. > > + */ > > +void klp_force_signals(void) > > Since "force" now has a separate meaning, it's a little confusing to > have it in the name of this function. How about klp_send_signals() or > klp_signal()? or klp_send_signal()? Miroslav